Skip to main content

By State / Wisconsin

Wisconsin Trucking Email Security

77.0% of active carrier domains in Wisconsin have no enforced DMARC — leaving freight operators open to email impersonation, payment-redirect fraud, and cargo theft via phishing.

Edition: 2026-Q2State rank: #9Carriers: 13,274Domains: 9,644
By Stefan Efros, CEO & Founder, EFROS
Updated ·

No enforced DMARC

77.0%

national: 80.1%

p=reject

10.0%

national: 7.5%

Microsoft 365

40.9%

national: 38.1%

M365 + no DMARC (carriers)

2,976

national: 92,822

MTA-STS

3.8%

national: 3.3%

DNSSEC

4.6%

national: 6.1%

Dead domains

624

of 9,644 scanned

Total carriers

13,274

628 with dead domain

Risk bands — Wisconsin carriers

Carrier counts by risk band (composite email-security pain score). Critical = score 70+; Minimal = score <15.

Risk bandScore rangeCarriersDomains
Criticalscore 70+1,032843
Highscore 50–693,7922,563
Mediumscore 30–495,5343,921
Lowscore 15–292,0991,602
Minimalscore <1518991

Wisconsin vs. national average

No enforced DMARC77.0%vs 80.1% national
p=reject adoption10.0%vs 7.5% national
MTA-STS3.8%vs 3.3% national
DNSSEC4.6%vs 6.1% national

What the Wisconsin numbers actually mean

DMARC posture. Wisconsin's share of carrier domains with no enforced DMARC sits at 77.0% better than the national average by 3.1 points. Wisconsin carriers adopt the enforced p=reject DMARC policy at a meaningfully higher rate than the national pool. At the protective end of the distribution, 10.0% of Wisconsin domains are at p=reject — the only DMARC policy that actually instructs receivers to drop spoofed mail.

Microsoft 365 surface. Microsoft 365 mailflow adoption is heavier than the national distribution, which is consequential — every M365 tenant already includes the controls needed to enforce DMARC, so the 2,976 M365 carriers in Wisconsin with DMARC disabled are leaving paid-for protection switched off. That share is 22.4% of all Wisconsin carriers — a one-flag-flip remediation set that any regional MSP or in-house IT lead can clear in a single quarter.

Transport encryption. MTA-STS adoption sits at 3.8%, materially below the threshold a freight payment-redirect attacker would have to clear to be inconvenienced by transport-layer policy. DNSSEC adoption in Wisconsin runs at 4.6% (vs 6.1% national) — meaningful for downstream DKIM and MTA-STS validation, but still a minority signal.

Risk-band shape. Wisconsin's critical-band share is 7.8% versus 8.4% nationally, with the pressure shifting into the high band (28.6% of state carriers) where one or two control gaps still leave room for impersonation. The composite pain score blends SPF posture, DMARC enforcement, MTA-STS presence, and DNSSEC — so a carrier clusters in the critical band only when several controls fail together. Remediation that flips DMARC to enforcement plus turns on MTA-STS typically moves a carrier two bands down in one quarter.

What this means for buyers and shippers. If you are dispatching freight, settling broker payments, or receiving rate confirmations from Wisconsin-based carriers, the operational exposure is the 77.0%of domains that cannot stop a stranger from sending email in the carrier's name. Payment-redirect and load-redirect fraud rides on exactly that gap. Verifying a counterparty's DMARC posture before a first wire — a 30-second DNS lookup — is the cheapest control in the freight stack.

Compare Wisconsin with other states

States closest in carrier-count rank to Wisconsin. Each is scored on the same DNS-derived control set, so the comparison is apples-to-apples.

See where your own domain stands

The research is free and self-serve. Run the same public checks on your own domain in about a minute — SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, and more — and get a scored report by email. No agents, no credentials.

Data as of 2026-05-20from public DNS measurements. Statistics are domain-weighted unless noted. State scope is the carrier's FMCSA-registered state. Methodology: read the full index.